Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Emerg Med ; 63(6): 723-728, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2095619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) arrived in the New York metropolitan area in early March 2020. Recommendations were made to self-quarantine within households and limit outside visits, including those to clinics and hospitals, to limit the spread of the virus. This resulted in a decrease in pediatric emergency department (ED) visits. However, it is unclear how this affected visits for some common diagnoses such as anxiety, appendicitis, asthma, headaches, seizures, and urinary tract infection (UTI). These diagnoses were chosen a priori, as they were felt to represent visits to the ED, for which the diagnoses would likely not be altered based on COVID exposure or quarantine due to their acute nature. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on common pediatric diagnoses seen in the pediatric ED using a large multihospital database. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive pediatric patients (age ≤ 21 years) between March 1 and November 30 in 2019 and 2020 in 28 hospital EDs within 150 miles of New York City. We compared the change in the number of visits from 2019 to 2020 for the following diagnoses: anxiety, appendicitis, asthma, headache, seizures, and UTI. RESULTS: Our database contained 346,230 total pediatric visits. From 2019 to 2020, total visits decreased by 61%. Decreases for specific diagnoses were 75% for asthma, 64% for headaches, 47% for UTI, 32% for anxiety, 28% for seizures, and 18% for appendicitis (p value for each comparison < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a marked decrease in ED visits for six common pediatric diagnoses after COVID-19 arrived in our area. We suspect that this decrease was due to recommendations to quarantine and fear of contracting the virus. Further studies on other diagnoses and potential complications due to the delay in seeking care are needed.


Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Asthma , COVID-19 , Humans , Child , Young Adult , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Appendicitis/diagnosis , Appendicitis/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Headache/etiology , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/epidemiology , Seizures , New York City/epidemiology
2.
The Journal of emergency medicine ; 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2034317

ABSTRACT

Background : COVID-19 arrived in the New York metropolitan area in early March 2020. Recommendations were made to self-quarantine within households and limit outside visits, including those to clinics and hospitals, to limit the spread of the virus. This resulted in a decrease in pediatric ED visits. However, it is unclear how this affected visits for some common diagnoses such as anxiety, appendicitis, asthma, headaches, seizures, and urinary tract infection (UTI). These diagnoses were chosen a priori, as they were felt to represent visits to the ED for which the diagnoses would likely not be altered based on COVID exposure or quarantine due to their acute nature. Objectives : Our goal was to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on common pediatric diagnoses seen in the pediatric ED using a large multihospital database. Methods : We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive pediatric patients (age ≤ 21 years) between March 1st and November 30th in 2019 and 2020 in 28 hospital EDs within 150 miles of New York City. We compared the change in the number of visits from 2019 to 2020 for the following diagnoses: anxiety, appendicitis, asthma, headache, seizures, and urinary tract infection (UTI). Results : Our database contained 346,230 total pediatric visits. From 2019 to 2020 total visits decreased by 61%. Decreases for specific diagnoses were 75% for asthma, 64% for headaches, 47% for UTI, 32% for anxiety, 28% for seizures and 18% for appendicitis (p value for each comparison < 0.0001). Conclusions : We found a marked decrease in ED visits for six common pediatric diagnoses after COVID-19 arrived in our area. We suspect that this decrease was due to recommendations to quarantine and fear of contracting the virus. Further studies on other diagnoses and/or potential complications due to the delay in seeking care are needed.

3.
J Emerg Nurs ; 47(2): 279-287.e1, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1195353

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In March and April 2020 of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, site clinical practice guidelines were implemented for prone positioning of patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 in hypoxic respiratory distress who are awake, alert, and spontaneously breathing. The purpose of this pandemic disaster practice improvement project was to measure changes in pulse oximetry associated with prone positioning of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection in adult acute respiratory distress or adult respiratory distress syndrome, who are awake, alert, spontaneously breathing, and nonintubated. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who were coronavirus disease 2019 positive in the emergency department from March 30, 2020 to April 30, 2020 was conducted for patients with a room air pulse oximetry <90% and a preprone position pulse oximetry ≤94% who tolerated prone positioning for at least 30 minutes. The primary outcome was the change in pulse oximetry associated with prone positioning, measured on room air, with supplemental oxygen, and approximately 30 minutes after initiating prone positioning. Median and mean differences were compared with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. RESULTS: Of the 440 patients with coronavirus disease 2019, 31 met inclusion criteria. Median pulse oximetry increased as 83% (interquartile range, 75%-86%) on room air, 90% (interquartile range, 89%-93%) with supplemental oxygen, and 96% (interquartile range, 94%-98%) with prone positioning (z = -4.48, P < .001). A total of 45% (n = 14) were intubated during their hospital stay, and 26% (n = 8) of the included patients died. DISCUSSION: In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who are awake, alert, and spontaneously breathing, an initially low pulse oximetry reading improved with prone positioning. Future studies are needed to determine the association of prone positioning with subsequent endotracheal intubation and mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Patient Positioning/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/complications , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Female , Humans , Hypoxia/complications , Hypoxia/diagnosis , Hypoxia/therapy , Intubation, Intratracheal , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , New Jersey , Oximetry , Prone Position , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Vaccine ; 38(45): 6967-6968, 2020 10 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-809477
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL